They might not aware they pick targets inside relationships much more alluring than just unmarried targets

Into odds of kissing on the target, there is certainly a life threatening correspondence ranging from grandiose narcissism and you will participant gender, ? = .161, t = 2.819, p = .005. That it interaction try presented inside Fig dos. The straightforward mountains for males (effortless hill = 0.051., t = .007, p = .995) and you may female (easy slope = -0.011., t = -0.002, p = .999) weren’t significant. Grandiose narcissists didn’t express an increased probability of kissing having an attached address more than just a single one (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), suggesting you to definitely grandiose narcissism wasn’t of partner poaching to have a preliminary-title fling.

Grandiose narcissists tend to report partner poaching -specifically for new small-term . Although not, a concern stays as to whether or not they get a hold of members of relationship a great deal more value getting than simply individuals who are unmarried. Widman and you will McNulty reason why grandiose narcissistic inclinations would be activated round the circumstances typically (including the care about-report of lives prevalence from intimate conclusion), but not become triggered whenever placed in a certain state. Thus, it’s possible that grandiose narcissists reveal a reputation engaging inside the mate poaching, but do not fundamentally look for those who work in relationship is finest mates. I tested this possibility inside four degree.

Partner poaching list.

For very long-identity mate poaching, grandiose narcissism was a life threatening predictor for ladies (? = .306, t = 2.623, p = .010) and you may a marginally tall predictor for males (? = .218, t = step one.725, p = .088). None of your own Huge Five parameters were high. Grandiose narcissism was not a serious predictor of success at poaching to the much time-term for males (? = .120, t = 0.718, p = .476), nevertheless was for ladies (? = .340, t = 2.369, p = .021). Not one of the other factors had been significant apart from women’s neuroticism; when ladies were significantly more neurotic, it advertised so much more achievements within poaching for a long-name sexual relationships.

Results

Of great interest, grandiose narcissism wasn’t of this mate poaching one of boys. Which result is in keeping with performance advertised by the Kardum and you may acquaintances . For this reason, it will be possible one grandiose narcissistic ladies are more frequently bad regarding spouse poaching.

Content and you may processes

There was a significant three-way interaction between grandiose narcissism, participant relationship status, and participant sex for the likelihood of pursuing the target for a relationship (? = .162, t = 2.666, p = .008). This three-way interaction is displayed in Fig 1. Data are plotted at ±1 SD from the mean of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached men was significant (simple slope = .05, t = 9.24, p < .001), revealing that men in a relationship were more likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached women (simple slope = -.04, t = -3.27, p = .001) revealed that women in a relationship were less likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single men was also significant (simple slope = -.02, t = -2.38, p = .02), revealing that single men were less interested in pursuing the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single women was not significant (simple slope = .024, t = 1.56, p = .12). With the exception of the slope differences between single women and attached men (t = -1.65, p = .10), the differences in slopes were all significant (ts ? -2.16, ps ? .03). The grandiose narcissism ? target relationship status interaction was not significant (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating that grandiose narcissism was not associated with mate poaching for a long-term affair.